Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36982708›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Heritable Risk and Protective Genetic Components of Glaucoma Medication Non-Adherence.

Julie L Barr, Michael Feehan, Casey Tak, Leah A Owen, Robert C Finley, Parker A Cromwell, John H Lillvis, Patrice M Hicks, Elizabeth Au, Michael H Farkas and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Julie L BarrNeuroscience Graduate Program, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Michael FeehanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Casey TakDepartments of Pharmacotherapy and Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 8413, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1203-1782
Leah A OwenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3802-3868
Robert C FinleyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Parker A CromwellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
John H LillvisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8274-8511
Patrice M HicksDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3399-9028
Elizabeth AuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Michael H FarkasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1102-3999
Asher WeinerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Andrew L ReynoldsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Sandra F SieminskiCerner Enviza, an Oracle Company, Kansas City, MO 64117, USA.
Richard M ShervaDepartment of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics), Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Mark A MungerDepartments of Pharmacotherapy and Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 8413, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9543-1898
Murray H BrilliantCenter for Precision Medicine Research, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.
Margaret M DeAngelisNeuroscience Graduate Program, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-142X
New York University · USUniversity of Utah · USOracle (United States) · USBoston University · USMarshfield Clinic · USUniversity of Michigan · USVA Western New York Healthcare System · US

Funding

Use of Rapamycin for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Noonan Syndrome with Multiple Lentigines (NSML)ZIATR000012 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI OTTINGER, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2019
$8.2M
Systems-Biology Analysis of Mechanisms Informing Preeclampsia-Mediated ROP ProtectionK08EY031800 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI OWEN, LEAH A · 2020 to 2022
$497k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR0012-05NEI NIH HHS K08 EY031800NIH HHS 1K08EY031800-01Unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences - Moran Eye Center, and The Ira G. Ross and Elizabeth Olmsted Ross Endowed Chair NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness, affecting 76 million globally. It is characterized by irreversible damage to the optic nerve. Pharmacotherapy manages intraocular pressure (IOP) and slows disease progression. However, non-adherence to glaucoma medications remains problematic, with 41-71% of patients being non-adherent to their prescribed medication. Despite substantial investment in research, clinical effort, and patient education protocols, non-adherence remains high. Therefore, we aimed to determine if there is a substantive genetic component behind patients' glaucoma medication non-adherence. We assessed glaucoma medication non-adherence with prescription refill data from the Marshfield Clinic Healthcare System's pharmacy dispensing database. Two standard measures were calculated: the medication possession ratio (MPR) and the proportion of days covered (PDC). Non-adherence on each metric was defined as less than 80% medication coverage over 12 months. Genotyping was done using the Illumina HumanCoreExome BeadChip in addition to exome sequencing on the 230 patients (1) to calculate the heritability of glaucoma medication non-adherence and (2) to identify SNPs and/or coding variants in genes associated with medication non-adherence. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) was utilized to derive biological meaning from any significant genes in aggregate. Over 12 months, 59% of patients were found to be non-adherent as measured by the MPR80, and 67% were non-adherent as measured by the PDC80. Genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA) suggested that 57% (MPR80) and 48% (PDC80) of glaucoma medication non-adherence could be attributed to a genetic component. Missense mutations in

Indexed as

GlaucomaMedication AdherenceDisease ProgressionGlutathione TransferaseHumansIntraocular PressureRetrospective StudiesSample SizeGlutathione TransferaseGSTZ1 protein, humanadherencegeneticglaucomaheritabilitymedicationnon-adherenceprotectionrisk

Identifiers

PMID36982708
PMCPMC10058353
OpenAlexW4327622647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.