Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36982423›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Bottom-Up Proteomics: Advancements in Sample Preparation.

Van-An Duong, Hookeun Lee

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Outer membrane vesicles fromMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methods for the Investigation of Protein-Ligands Interactions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Van-An DuongCollege of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4676-1804
Hookeun LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-8421

Funding

Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology 20018578National Research Foundation of Korea 2017M3D9A1073784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based proteomics is a powerful technique for profiling proteomes of cells, tissues, and body fluids. Typical bottom-up proteomic workflows consist of the following three major steps: sample preparation, LC-MS/MS analysis, and data analysis. LC-MS/MS and data analysis techniques have been intensively developed, whereas sample preparation, a laborious process, remains a difficult task and the main challenge in different applications. Sample preparation is a crucial stage that affects the overall efficiency of a proteomic study; however, it is prone to errors and has low reproducibility and throughput. In-solution digestion and filter-aided sample preparation are the typical and widely used methods. In the past decade, novel methods to improve and facilitate the entire sample preparation process or integrate sample preparation and fractionation have been reported to reduce time, increase throughput, and improve reproducibility. In this review, we have outlined the current methods used for sample preparation in proteomics, including on-membrane digestion, bead-based digestion, immobilized enzymatic digestion, and suspension trapping. Additionally, we have summarized and discussed current devices and methods for integrating different steps of sample preparation and peptide fractionation.

Indexed as

ProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidPeptidesProteomeReproducibility of ResultsPeptidesProteomeautomationFASPin-solution digestionLC-MS/MSproteomicssample preparationSP3S-Trap

Identifiers

PMID36982423
PMCPMC10049050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read45
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.