Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981915›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for the Assessment of Functional Capacity, the Risk of Falls and Pressure Injuries in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part II).

David Luna-Aleixos, Irene Llagostera-Reverter, Ximo Castelló-Benavent, Marta Aquilué-Ballarín, Gema Mecho-Montoliu, Águeda Cervera-Gasch, María Jesús Valero-Chillerón, Desirée Mena-Tudela, Laura Andreu-Pejó, Rafael Martínez-Gonzálbez and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk Profiles in Hospitalized Adults Based on Functional Capacity, Pressure Injury Risk, and Fall Risk: A Cluster and Multiple Correspondence Analysis.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David Luna-AleixosHospital Universitario de La Plana, Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6062-9810
Irene Llagostera-ReverterNursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6722-0356
Ximo Castelló-BenaventMathematics Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Marta Aquilué-BallarínNursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Gema Mecho-MontoliuHospital Universitario de La Plana, 12540 Villarreal, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1563-4842
Águeda Cervera-GaschNursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8187-680X
María Jesús Valero-ChillerónNursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-5243
Desirée Mena-TudelaNursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1596-3064
Laura Andreu-PejóNursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2944-9878
Rafael Martínez-GonzálbezHospital Universitario de La Plana, 12540 Villarreal, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6430-7624
Víctor M González-ChordáNursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7426-6686
Universitat Jaume I · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nursing assessment is the first step of the nursing process and fundamental to detecting patients' care needs and at-risk situations. This article presents the psychometric properties of the VALENF Instrument, a recently developed meta-instrument with only seven items that integrates the assessment of functional capacity, risk of pressure injuries and risk of falls with a more parsimonious approach to nursing assessment in adult hospitalization units. A cross-sectional study based on recorded data in a sample of 1352 nursing assessments was conducted. Sociodemographic variables and assessments of the Barthel, Braden and Downton instruments were included at the time of admission through the electronic health history. Thus, the VALENF Instrument obtained high content validity (S-CVI = 0.961), construct validity (RMSEA = 0.072; TLI = 0.968) and internal consistency (Ω = 0.864). However, the inter-observer reliability results were not conclusive, with Kappa values ranging between 0.213 and 0.902 points. The VALENF Instrument has adequate psychometric properties (content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and inter-observer reliability) for assessing the level of functional capacity, risk of pressure injuries and risk of falls. Future studies are necessary to establish its diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerAccidental FallsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalizationHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaireshospitalizationnursesnursingnursing assessmentvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID36981915
PMCPMC10049057
OpenAlexW4324095410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read23
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.