Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981899›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Breast Cancer and Screening Prevention Programmes: Perceptions of Women in a Multicultural Community in Southern Thailand.

Dusanee Suwankhong, Pranee Liamputtong, Tum Boonrod, Witchada Simla, Sermsak Khunpol, Sasithorn Thanapop

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bangkok declarations on cancer control in Asia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dusanee SuwankhongDepartment of Public Health, Thaksin University, Pa Phayom 93210, Phatthalung, Thailand.
Pranee LiamputtongCollege of Health Sciences, VinUniversity, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Tum BoonrodDepartment of Public Health, Thaksin University, Pa Phayom 93210, Phatthalung, Thailand.
Witchada SimlaDepartment of Public Health, Thaksin University, Pa Phayom 93210, Phatthalung, Thailand.
Sermsak KhunpolDepartment of Library, Information Science and Communication Arts, Thaksin University, Muang 90000, Songkhla, Thailand.
Sasithorn ThanapopMaster of Public Health Programme, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Thasala 80160, Nakhon-Si-Thammarat, Thailand.
Thaksin University · THVinUniversity · VNWalailak University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide and in Thailand.

objectiveTo explore perceptions of breast cancer and screening prevention programmes among a group of at-risk women in a multicultural setting in southern Thailand.

methodsSemi-structured in-depth interviews were used for data collection with 30 at-risk group women. Women from Muslim and Buddhist backgrounds were purposively included in this study. The thematic analysis method was used to analyse the data.

resultsFour themes were identified from our data: perceptions of breast cancer, being diagnosed with breast cancer and anxiety, stigma: effects of breast cancer, and breast self-screening and prevention of breast cancer. The participants had some knowledge about the risk factors for breast cancer. However, participants perceived that breast cancer could occur to individual women at any time and that it was not possible to entirely prevent the disease, even when following a breast self-examination programme. However, most participants perceived that whether one would be afflicted by breast cancer depended also on Allah and their own karma. All participants were encouraged to attend breast self-screening training by healthcare providers of local health centres, but they had no confidence to perform self-screening soon after finishing the training programme. This became the reason for a lack of regular self-screening with responsibility left to health practitioners. Although participants were aware that breast self-screening should be their routine practice, there were multiple barriers to this, including accurate knowledge about breast cancer, belief, self-awareness, screening skills and healthcare facilities. Breast self-screening was recognised as an important means of early detection. However, most women did not perform this regularly, which could increase their risk of developing breast cancer.

conclusionsPublic health providers need to be more concerned about the perceptions, beliefs and practices regarding breast cancer and develop prevention practices that work better for women living in more diverse cultural locations so that they may be able to follow preventive practices and reduce their vulnerability to breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreast Self-ExaminationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPerceptionThailandbreast cancerperceptionsqualitative studyrisk grouprural communityscreening prevention

Identifiers

PMID36981899
PMCPMC10049010
OpenAlexW4324095610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.