Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981838›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Obstetric Violence from a Midwife Perspective.

Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano, Julián Rodríguez-Almagro, Ana Rubio-Álvarez, Inmaculada Ortiz-Esquinas, Ana Ballesta-Castillejos, Antonio Hernández-Martínez

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan Miguel Martínez-GalianoNursing Department, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain.
Julián Rodríguez-AlmagroDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Ciudad Real Faculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6239-2842
Ana Rubio-ÁlvarezHospital Universitario de Torrejon, 28850 Madrid, Spain.
Inmaculada Ortiz-EsquinasHospial Universitario Reina Sofia, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0332-9904
Ana Ballesta-CastillejosDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Albacete Faculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02008 Albacete, Spain.
Antonio Hernández-MartínezDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Ciudad Real Faculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9100-1134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines and determines the prevalence of obstetric violence (OV) as perceived by midwives, as well as their knowledge of it and the professional factors that could be associated with the perception of OV. A cross-sectional study was conducted of 325 midwives in 2021 in Spain. Almost all (92.6%, 301) the midwives knew the term OV, but 74.8% (214) did not believe OV to be the same as malpractice. Moreover, 56.9% (185) stated they had rarely observed OV, and 26.5% (86) regularly observed OV. Most midwives consider physical aggression to be OV, in comparison, not providing information to women was only considered unacceptable treatment. The clinical practice considered the most grave within the context of OV was an instrumental birth or cesarean section without clinical justification. In addition, 97.5% (317) believed that raising awareness on the subject is one of the fundamental points to reducing this problem. Certain factors, such as less work experience, female gender, attendance at home births, and previous training in OV, were associated with an increased perception of situations as OV (

Indexed as

MidwiferyCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancyViolencechildbirthhuman rightsinadequate treatmentmidwivesobstetric violence

Identifiers

PMID36981838
PMCPMC10049399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read34
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.