Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981693›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Use of Wearable Activity-Monitoring Technologies to Promote Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Opportunities for Improved Cancer Care.

Melanie R Keats, Xing Yu, Molly Sweeney Magee, Cynthia C Forbes, Scott A Grandy, Ellen Sweeney, Trevor J B Dummer

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Update on Occupational Cancer for Better Cancer Prevention and Control.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie R KeatsSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-5324
Xing YuSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2396-9258
Molly Sweeney MageeSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-6516
Cynthia C ForbesWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Scott A GrandySchool of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Ellen SweeneyBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7549-0011
Trevor J B DummerSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2510-3570
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review was to explore the acceptability, opportunities, and challenges associated with wearable activity-monitoring technology to increase physical activity (PA) behavior in cancer survivors. A search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and SportDiscus was conducted from 1 January 2011 through 3 October 2022. The search was limited to English language, and peer-reviewed original research. Studies were included if they reported the use of an activity monitor in adults (+18 years) with a history of cancer with the intent to motivate PA behavior. Our search identified 1832 published articles, of which 28 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eighteen of these studies included post-treatment cancer survivors, eight were on active cancer treatment, and two were long-term cancer survivor studies. ActiGraph accelerometers were the primary technology used to monitor PA behaviors, with Fitbit as the most commonly utilized self-monitoring wearable technology. Overall, wearable activity monitors were found to be an acceptable and useful tool in improving self-awareness, motivating behavioral change, and increasing PA levels. Self-monitoring wearable activity devices have a positive impact on short-term PA behaviors in cancer survivors, but the increase in PA gradually attenuated through the maintenance phase. Further study is needed to evaluate and increase the sustainability of the use of wearable technologies to support PA in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsWearable Electronic DevicesAdultExerciseFitness TrackersHumansbehavior changecancer survivorsmotivationphysical activityscoping reviewtechnologywearable activity monitors

Identifiers

PMID36981693
PMCPMC10048707
OpenAlexW4323665023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.