Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981682›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Differences in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress Scores between Smartphone Version versus Paper Version Administration: Evidence of Equivalence.

Kazuki Hirao, Hyono Takahashi, Natsuki Kuroda, Hiroyuki Uchida, Kenji Tsuchiya, Senichiro Kikuchi

Full text readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kazuki HiraoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8514, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2467-7564
Hyono TakahashiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8514, Japan.
Natsuki KurodaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8514, Japan.
Hiroyuki UchidaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kurashiki Heisei Hospital, Kurashiki 710-0826, Japan.
Kenji TsuchiyaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nagano University of Health and Medicine, Nagano 381-2227, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0524-9070
Senichiro KikuchiGraduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8514, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3959-4734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of electronic patient-reported outcomes has increased recently, and smartphones offer distinct advantages over other devices. However, previous systematic reviews have not investigated the reliability of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6) when used with smartphones, and this has not been fully explored. This study aimed to evaluate the equivalence of the paper and smartphone versions of the CES-D, GAD-7, and K6, which were compared following a randomized crossover design method in 100 adults in Gunma, Japan. Participants responded to the paper and smartphone versions at 1-week intervals. The equivalence of paper and smartphone versions was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychological DistressCross-Over StudiesEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMalePaperReproducibility of ResultsSmartphoneYoung Adultanxietydepressionelectronicpatient-reported outcomessmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36981682
PMCPMC10049019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read52
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.