ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
How Do Repeated Viewings in Forest Landscapes Influence Young People's Visual Behaviors and Cognitive Evaluations?
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, it has gradually become normal to periodically visit and enjoy forest landscape resources in the suburbs of cities. For designers and managers of forest landscapes, exploring change in the visual behaviors and cognitive evaluations of people who repeatedly view forest landscapes and the characteristics of this change will aid the design and sustainable utilization of forest landscape resources in the suburbs of cities. PURPOSE: From the perspective of users' preferences for forest landscape space, this study explored the changes in visual behavior characteristics and psychological preference characteristics for individuals who repeatedly view forest landscapes and their drivers under different preferences.
methodsThis study collected data from 52 graduate and undergraduate students. We used a difference test to compare the differences in the visual behavior coincidence degree and the changes in psychological evaluations; a descriptive statistical analysis to explore young peoples' likes and dislikes of landscape elements; and Spearman correlation analysis to explore the correlation between the psychological evaluations and visual behaviors. MAIN
results1. At the second viewing, the participants' regression behavior tended to decrease for various spaces, and they were more inclined to view areas that they had not viewed before. In addition, at the second viewing, the degree of fixation behavior coincidence was generally low, and there were obvious differences across spaces; 2. The participants' feature evaluations and comprehensive evaluations for landscapes did not change significantly with their increased familiarity with the spaces; 3. There was a significant positive correlation between the participants' psychological evaluations of landscape stimuli and the degree of fixation coincidence when viewing the spaces, among which the rate of distant clarity and the degree of fixation behavior coincidence were significantly and positively correlated. Meanwhile, at the second viewing, the number of favorite elements in the lookout space, which belongs to high-preference spaces, noticeably increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.