Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981643›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Enhancing Equitable Access to Rare Disease Diagnosis and Treatment around the World: A Review of Evidence, Policies, and Challenges.

Takeya Adachi, Ayman W El-Hattab, Ritu Jain, Katya A Nogales Crespo, Camila I Quirland Lazo, Maurizio Scarpa, Marshall Summar, Duangrurdee Wattanasirichaigoon

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decoding Genetic Disease Through the Skin: Lessons From the UDN.International journal of dermatology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. 'If You Don't Fight for Yourself, No One Else Will': An In-Depth Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Rare Disorder Care Advocacy in Aotearoa New Zealand.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takeya AdachiDepartment of Dermatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-5980
Ayman W El-HattabDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-5737-5271
Ritu JainDystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association (DEBRA), Singapore 059811, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4297-4319
Katya A Nogales CrespoPolicy Wisdom LLC, Quebradillas 00678-2705, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0001-5806-0805
Camila I Quirland LazoHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Cancer Research Department, Arturo López Perez Foundation, Santiago 7500921, Chile.
Maurizio ScarpaEuropean Reference Network for Hereditary Metabolic Diseases (MetabERN), 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0382-3251
Marshall SummarThe Translational Science Training Program, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Maryland, MD 20814, USA.
Duangrurdee WattanasirichaigoonThai Rare Disease Foundation (ThaiRDF), Bangkok 10230, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-2176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This document provides a comprehensive summary of evidence on the current situation of rare diseases (RDs) globally and regionally, including conditions, practices, policies, and regulations, as well as the challenges and barriers faced by RD patients, their families, and caregivers. The document builds on a review of academic literature and policies and a process of validation and feedback by a group of seven experts from across the globe. Panelists were selected based on their academic merit, expertise, and knowledge regarding the RD environment. The document is divided into five main sections: (1) methodology and objective; (2) background and context; (3) overview of the current situation and key challenges related to RDs covering six dimensions: burden of disease, patient journey, social impact, disease management, RD-related policies, and research and development; (4) recommendations; and (5) conclusions. The recommendations are derived from the discussion undertaken by the experts on the findings of this review and provide a set of actionable solutions to the challenges and barriers to improving access to RD diagnosis and treatment around the world. The recommendations can support critical decision-making, guiding efforts by a broad range of RDs stakeholders, including governments, international organizations, manufacturers, researchers, and patient advocacy groups.

Indexed as

Health PolicyRare DiseasesHumansburden of diseasedisease managementhealth equityhealth policiespatient journeyrare diseasessocial impact

Identifiers

PMID36981643
PMCPMC10049067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read11
measurements read60
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.