Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981563›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Psychometric Study of the Perinatal Assessment of Maternal Affectivity (PAMA) for the Screening of Perinatal Affective Disorders in Mothers.

Franco Baldoni, Francesca Agostini, Grazia Terrone, Giulia Casu, Michele Giannotti

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. When a Parent Is Born: An Integrated Approach to Perinatal Mental Health and Early Risk Screening.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franco BaldoniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-749X
Francesca AgostiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Grazia TerroneDepartment of History, Cultural Heritage, Education and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Giulia CasuDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-3044
Michele GiannottiDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, 38068 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-6977
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, empirical evidence from perinatal studies has led researchers to pay more attention to fathers. The need to evaluate male suffering led at first to using the same screening tools developed for mothers. However, these instruments present validity concerns with fathers, and today the need to assume a gender-based perspective is clear. The Perinatal Assessment of Paternal Affectivity (PAPA) is a self-reported questionnaire for the screening of a variety of psychological and behavioral dimensions related to affectivity as experienced by fathers during the perinatal period. In the present study, the psychometric properties of the maternal version of the scale (Perinatal Assessment of Maternal Affectivity; PAMA) were examined. The study, based on 225 mothers and their partners (

Indexed as

affective disordersanxietydepressionfathersmothersPAMAPAPAperinatalscreening

Identifiers

PMID36981563
PMCPMC10048133
OpenAlexW4353091479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read30
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.