ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Evaluation of the Medical Resource Allocation: Evidence from China.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charting the blueprint: a bibliometric analysis reveals future strategies in lung cancer targeted therapy (2003-2025).Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Development and content validation of a health assessment item bank for regional health big data: a sequential mixed-methods approach.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
- Assessing the relationship between the hospital grading system and medical resource utilization: evidence from China.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- From growth to well-being: pathways and social security effects of coordinating medical resources and population in the Yangtze River Delta region.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal evolution and determinants analysis of health resource supply-demand coupling coordination in China.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- The impacts of diagnosis-intervention packet payment on inpatient medical costs for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors: evidence from a retrospective study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Accessibility evaluation and multi-scenario optimization of medical services in underdeveloped city driven by multi-source data and latest policies for China.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spatial Allocation Rationality Analysis of Medical Resources Based on Multi-Source Data: Case Study of Taiyuan, China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Research on the coupling measurement of medical education and health resource allocation under the background of healthy China.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Medical Resource Management in Emergency Hierarchical Diagnosis and Treatment Systems: A Research Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Regional differences in health resource allocation: a longitudinal study in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle, China.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Modification of gemcitabine with oxaliplatin in China for unresectable gallbladder cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Exploring Older Adults' Perceived Affordability and Accessibility of the Healthcare System: Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Social Survey 2021.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical resource allocation is an increasingly crucial issue. It is vital to understand residents' (people living in the local area) evaluation of it. This study explores residents' evaluation of medical resource allocation and its determinants with the dimensions of medical resource adequacy, balance, publicness, and accessibility. We used data from the China General Social Survey (CGSS). Binary logistic regression models were constructed from the four dimensions separately, and we compared the differences among them. The study's results showed that accessibility and publicness are the highest and lowest dimensions of residents' evaluation, respectively. The high evaluation of social equity may be a positive contributor to a higher evaluation of publicness and accessibility. The central region residents had the lowest evaluation of adequacy (OR = 0.697,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.