Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981260›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effects of Plant-Based Antioxidants in Animal Diets and Meat Products: A Review.

Carmen Daniela Petcu, Oana Diana Mihai, Dana Tăpăloagă, Raluca-Aniela Gheorghe-Irimia, Elena Narcisa Pogurschi, Manuella Militaru, Cristin Borda, Oana-Mărgărita Ghimpețeanu

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Integrated Approach to Evaluate the Influence of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen Daniela PetcuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 105 Blvd., Splaiul Independentei, 050097 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0487-0057
Oana Diana MihaiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 105 Blvd., Splaiul Independentei, 050097 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4531-0451
Dana TăpăloagăFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 105 Blvd., Splaiul Independentei, 050097 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-7880
Raluca-Aniela Gheorghe-IrimiaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 105 Blvd., Splaiul Independentei, 050097 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8056-0670
Elena Narcisa PogurschiFaculty of Animal Productions Engineering and Management, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, 59 Blvd., Marasti, 011464 Bucharest, Romania.
Manuella MilitaruFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 105 Blvd., Splaiul Independentei, 050097 Bucharest, Romania.
Cristin BordaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mânăștur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oana-Mărgărita GhimpețeanuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 105 Blvd., Splaiul Independentei, 050097 Bucharest, Romania.
University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest · ROUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · RO

Funding

University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest Projects Competition, 2022, Contract No. 1061/15.06.2022 COD 2022-0019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perceived level of risk associated with a food product can influence purchase and consumption decisions. Thus, current trends in food safety address an issue of general interest-the identification of healthy and economical alternatives to synthetic antioxidants that may have harmful effects on human health. Still, the processors' target is to increase the shelf life of food products using preserving substances. Natural antioxidants can be extracted and used in the food industry from different plants, such as blueberry, broccoli, chokeberry, cinnamon, ginger, olives, oregano, etc. The identification of the main natural antioxidant types that have been used in the food industry is very important in order to provide a comprehensive analysis of the researched topic. In this regard, the aim of this paper was to illustrate the positive aspects of using natural antioxidants with preservative roles in meat products, while, at the same time, highlighting the potential risks induced by these compounds. All of those aspects are correlated with the impact of sensorial attributes and the improvement of the nutritional value of meat products.

Indexed as

food safetymeat productsnatural antioxidantspublic healthrisk

Identifiers

PMID36981260
PMCPMC10047951
OpenAlexW4328095713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read33
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.