Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981168›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety: A Decade Review and Bibliometric Analysis.

Zhe Liu, Shuzhe Wang, Yudong Zhang, Yichen Feng, Jiajia Liu, Hengde Zhu

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety: A Tertiary Study.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  5. Impact of Farm Management Practices onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Machine Learning in Transforming the Food Industry.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Transforming beef quality through healthy breeding: a strategy to reduce carcinogenic compounds and enhance human health: a review.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhe LiuSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0934-4438
Shuzhe WangSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yudong ZhangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-1493
Yichen FengSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-8725
Jiajia LiuSchool of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Hengde ZhuSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7027-3969

Funding

British Heart Foundation Accelerator Award AA/18/3/34220China Scholarship Council 202008410082Fight for Sight 24NN201Medical Research Council MC_PC_17171National Social Science Foundation of China 21BGL052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies have been powerful solutions used to improve food yield, quality, and nutrition, increase safety and traceability while decreasing resource consumption, and eliminate food waste. Compared with several qualitative reviews on AI in food safety, we conducted an in-depth quantitative and systematic review based on the Core Collection database of WoS (Web of Science). To discover the historical trajectory and identify future trends, we analysed the literature concerning AI technologies in food safety from 2012 to 2022 by CiteSpace. In this review, we used bibliometric methods to describe the development of AI in food safety, including performance analysis, science mapping, and network analysis by CiteSpace. Among the 1855 selected articles, China and the United States contributed the most literature, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences released the largest number of relevant articles. Among all the journals in this field,

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebibliometric reviewCiteSpacefood safety

Identifiers

PMID36981168
PMCPMC10048131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read30
measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.