Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981000›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

Internal Transcribed Spacer and 16S Amplicon Sequencing Identifies Microbial Species Associated with Asbestos in New Zealand.

Erin Doyle, Dan Blanchon, Sarah Wells, Peter de Lange, Pete Lockhart, Nick Waipara, Michael Manefield, Shannon Wallis, Terri-Ann Berry

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Erin DoyleApplied Molecular Solutions Research Centre, Te Pūkenga-New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Private Bag 92025, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Dan BlanchonApplied Molecular Solutions Research Centre, Te Pūkenga-New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Private Bag 92025, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Sarah WellsApplied Molecular Solutions Research Centre, Te Pūkenga-New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Private Bag 92025, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Peter de LangeApplied Molecular Solutions Research Centre, Te Pūkenga-New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Private Bag 92025, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-7083
Pete LockhartInstitute of Fundamental Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-5688
Nick WaiparaThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Mt Albert, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Michael ManefieldWater Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1880-0888
Shannon WallisEnvironmental Solutions Research Centre, Te Pūkenga-New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Private Bag 92025, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0052-2453
Terri-Ann BerryEnvironmental Solutions Research Centre, Te Pūkenga-New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Private Bag 92025, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5129-4622
Te PūkengaMassey University · NZPlant & Food Research · NZUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalation of asbestos fibres can cause lung inflammation and the later development of asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma, and the use of asbestos is banned in many countries. In most countries, large amounts of asbestos exists within building stock, buried in landfills, and in contaminated soil. Mechanical, thermal, and chemical treatment options do exist, but these are expensive, and they are not effective for contaminated soil, where only small numbers of asbestos fibres may be present in a large volume of soil. Research has been underway for the last 20 years into the potential use of microbial action to remove iron and other metal cations from the surface of asbestos fibres to reduce their toxicity. To access sufficient iron for metabolism, many bacteria and fungi produce organic acids, or iron-chelating siderophores, and in a growing number of experiments these have been found to degrade asbestos fibres in vitro. This paper uses the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 16S amplicon sequencing to investigate the fungal and bacterial diversity found on naturally-occurring asbestos minerals, asbestos-containing building materials, and asbestos-contaminated soils with a view to later selectively culturing promising species, screening them for siderophore production, and testing them with asbestos fibres in vitro. After filtering, 895 ITS and 1265 16S amplicon sequencing variants (ASVs) were detected across the 38 samples, corresponding to a range of fungal, bacteria, cyanobacterial, and lichenized fungal species. Samples from Auckland (North Island, New Zealand) asbestos cement, Auckland asbestos-contaminated soils, and raw asbestos rocks from Kahurangi National Park (South Island, New Zealand) were comprised of very different microbial communities. Five of the fungal species detected in this study are known to produce siderophores.

Indexed as

AsbestosSiderophoresBacteriaIronNew ZealandSoilAsbestosIronSiderophoresSoilamplicon sequencingasbestosbacteriabioremediationchrysotilefungiNew Zealandsiderophores

Identifiers

PMID36981000
PMCPMC10048439
OpenAlexW4327599701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read7
measurements read23
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.