ArticleGenes2023
Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell deoxyribonucleic acid typing for forensic mixtures and trace evidence: Opportunities, validation requirements, and reporting limits.World journal of biological chemistry · 2026Review
- Forging new insights in forensic microbiome studies: A 2000 to 2024 bibliometric analysis redefining the landscape.Medicine · 2026Review
- DNA Mixture Deconvolution: A Four-Strategy Framework from Physical Separation to Database Searching.Genes · 2026Review
- Single cell genomics applications in forensic science: Current state and future directions.iScience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probabilistic genotyping (PG) and its associated software has greatly aided in forensic DNA mixture analysis, with it primarily being applied to mixed DNA profiles obtained from bulk cellular extracts. However, these software applications do not always result in probative information about the identity of all donors to said mixtures/extracts. This is primarily due to mixture complexity caused by overlapping alleles and the presence of artifacts and minor donors. One way of reducing mixture complexity is to perform direct single cell subsampling of the bulk mixture prior to genotyping and interpretation. The analysis of low template DNA samples, including from single or few cells, has also benefited from the application of PG methods. With the application of PG, multiple cell subsamples originating from the same donor can be combined into a single analysis using the software replicate analysis function often resulting in full DNA profile donor information. In the present work, we demonstrate how two PG software systems, STRmix
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.