Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980886›Full record

SynthesisGenes2023

Review of Recurrently Mutated Genes in Craniosynostosis Supports Expansion of Diagnostic Gene Panels.

Rebecca S Tooze, Eduardo Calpena, Astrid Weber, Louise C Wilson, Stephen R F Twigg, Andrew O M Wilkie

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-syndromic craniosynostosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca S ToozeClinical Genetics Group, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-3765
Eduardo CalpenaClinical Genetics Group, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6399-6528
Astrid WeberLiverpool Centre for Genomic Medicine, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.
Louise C WilsonNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK.
Stephen R F TwiggClinical Genetics Group, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5024-049X
Andrew O M WilkieClinical Genetics Group, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2972-5481
University of Oxford · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_21044Medical Research Council MR/T031670/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, affects ~1 in 2000 children. Although many patients with a genetically determined cause harbor a variant in one of just seven genes or have a chromosomal abnormality, over 60 genes are known to be recurrently mutated, thus comprising a long tail of rarer diagnoses. Genome sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases is increasingly used in clinical settings, but analysis of the data is labor intensive and involves a trade-off between achieving high sensitivity or high precision. PanelApp, a crowd-sourced disease-focused set of gene panels, was designed to enable prioritization of variants in known disease genes for a given pathology, allowing enhanced identification of true-positives. For heterogeneous disorders like craniosynostosis, these panels must be regularly updated to ensure that diagnoses are not being missed. We provide a systematic review of genetic literature on craniosynostosis over the last 5 years, including additional results from resequencing a 42-gene panel in 617 affected individuals. We identify 16 genes (representing a 25% uplift) that should be added to the list of bona fide craniosynostosis disease genes and discuss the insights that these new genes provide into pathophysiological mechanisms of craniosynostosis.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesChildCranial SuturesHumanscraniosynostosisexome/genome sequencinggene-panelsPanelApp

Identifiers

PMID36980886
PMCPMC10048212
OpenAlexW4322741830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read11
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.