ArticleGenes2023
CoNet: Efficient Network Regression for Survival Analysis in Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies-With Applications to Studies of Breast Cancer.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) aim to detect associations between genetically predicted gene expression and complex diseases or traits through integrating genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping studies. Most current TWAS methods analyze one gene at a time, ignoring the correlations between multiple genes. Few of the existing TWAS methods focus on survival outcomes. Here, we propose a novel method, namely a COx proportional hazards model for NEtwork regression in TWAS (CoNet), that is applicable for identifying the association between one given network and the survival time. CoNet considers the general relationship among the predicted gene expression as edges of the network and quantifies it through pointwise mutual information (PMI), which is under a two-stage TWAS. Extensive simulation studies illustrate that CoNet can not only achieve type I error calibration control in testing both the node effect and edge effect, but it can also gain more power compared with currently available methods. In addition, it demonstrates superior performance in real data application, namely utilizing the breast cancer survival data of UK Biobank. CoNet effectively accounts for network structure and can simultaneously identify the potential effecting nodes and edges that are related to survival outcomes in TWAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.