Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980799›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Implication of Obesity and Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis in the Etiology of Colorectal Cancer.

Samradhi Singh, Poonam Sharma, Devojit Kumar Sarma, Manoj Kumawat, Rajnarayan Tiwari, Vinod Verma, Ravinder Nagpal, Manoj Kumar

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Murine Models of Obesity-Related Cancer Risk.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samradhi SinghIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal 462030, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1841-6429
Poonam SharmaIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal 462030, India.
Devojit Kumar SarmaIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal 462030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-4114
Manoj KumawatIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal 462030, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6088-4133
Rajnarayan TiwariIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal 462030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4676-9603
Vinod VermaStem Cell Research Centre, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India.
Ravinder NagpalDepartment of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32302, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4250-1749
Manoj KumarIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal 462030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-8631
Indian Council of Medical Research · INFlorida State University · USSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity and variety of gut microbiomes within and among individuals have been extensively studied in recent years in connection to human health and diseases. Our growing understanding of the bidirectional communication between metabolic diseases and the gut microbiome has also highlighted the significance of gut microbiome dysbiosis in the genesis and development of obesity-related cancers. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the possible role of the gut microbiota in the crosstalk between obesity and colorectal cancer (CRC). Through the induction of gut microbial dysbiosis, gut epithelial barrier impairment, metabolomic dysregulation, chronic inflammation, or dysregulation in energy harvesting, obesity may promote the development of colorectal tumors. It is well known that strategies for cancer prevention and treatment are most effective when combined with a healthy diet, physical activity, and active lifestyle choices. Recent studies also suggest that an improved understanding of the complex linkages between the gut microbiome and various cancers as well as metabolic diseases can potentially improve cancer treatments and overall outcomes. In this context, we herein review and summarize the clinical and experimental evidence supporting the functional role of the gut microbiome in the pathogenesis and progression of CRC concerning obesity and its metabolic correlates, which may pave the way for the development of novel prognostic tools for CRC prevention. Therapeutic approaches for restoring the microbiome homeostasis in conjunction with cancer treatments are also discussed herein.

Indexed as

bacteriophage therapybiofilmscolorectal cancerFMTgut dysbiosisgut microbiotainflammationobesityprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID36980799
PMCPMC10047102
OpenAlexW4360616120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read20
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.