Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980706›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Influence of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcomes of Capecitabine-Based Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

Yasmin Cura, Cristina Pérez-Ramírez, Almudena Sánchez-Martín, Cristina Membrive-Jimenez, María Isabel Valverde-Merino, Encarnación González-Flores, Alberto Jiménez Morales

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasmin CuraPharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Avda. de las Fuerzas Armadas 2, 18004 Granada, Spain.
Cristina Pérez-RamírezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, José Mataix Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, Center for Biomedical Research, Universidad de Granada, Avda. del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Almudena Sánchez-MartínPharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Avda. de las Fuerzas Armadas 2, 18004 Granada, Spain.
Cristina Membrive-JimenezPharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Avda. de las Fuerzas Armadas 2, 18004 Granada, Spain.
María Isabel Valverde-MerinoPharmaceutical Care Research Group, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Granada, Campus de la Cartuja, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-1551
Encarnación González-FloresMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Avda. de las Fuerzas Armadas 2, 18004 Granada, Spain.
Alberto Jiménez MoralesPharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Avda. de las Fuerzas Armadas 2, 18004 Granada, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PT13/0010/0039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature published in the last decade on the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes involved in the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic pathways of capecitabine with treatment outcomes among colorectal cancer patients. A systematic search of the literature published in the last 10 years was carried out in two databases (Medline and Scopus) using keywords related to the objective. Quality assessment of the studies included was performed using an assessment tool derived from the Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Association (STREGA) statement. Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review. Genes involved in bioactivation, metabolism, transport, mechanism of action of capecitabine, DNA repair, and folate cycle were associated with toxicity. Meanwhile, genes related to DNA repair were associated with therapy effectiveness. This systematic review reveals that several SNPs other than the four

Indexed as

capecitabineclinical outcomescolorectal cancerpharmacogeneticssingle-nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID36980706
PMCPMC10046456
OpenAlexW4327739779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read77
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.