Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980679›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Robotic versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in the New Era: Systematic Review.

Estefanía Ruiz Guerrero, Ana Victoria Ojeda Claro, María José Ledo Cepero, Manuel Soto Delgado, José Luis Álvarez-Ossorio Fernández

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07190638 (Comparison of Outcomes and Surgical Time Between Cortical and Medullary Suture vs. Medullary-Only Suture), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07190638 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Outcomes and Surgical Time Between Cortical and Medullary Suture vs. Medullary-Only Suture: Cortex Clinical Trial, From 2025 to 2027

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrazilian Institute of Robotic SurgeryRan2025 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsRCC, Renal Cell CancerArmsMedullary-only suturing (single-layer), Suture, Medullary and cortical suturing (two-layer), Hemostatic Agent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy using the HugoCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Estefanía Ruiz GuerreroUrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Ana Victoria Ojeda ClaroUrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2241-0823
María José Ledo CeperoUrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Manuel Soto DelgadoUrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
José Luis Álvarez-Ossorio FernándezUrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: In recent years there have been advances in imaging techniques, in addition to progress in the surgery of renal tumors directed towards minimally invasive techniques. Thus, nephron-sparing surgery has become the gold standard for the treatment of T1 renal masses. The aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of robotic partial nephrectomy in comparison with laparoscopic nephrectomy. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review according to the PRISMA criteria during September 2022. We included clinical trials, and cohort and case-control studies published between 2000 and 2022. This comprised studies performed in adult patients with T1 renal cancer and studies comparing robotic with open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. A risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. (3) Results: We observed lower hot ischemia times in the robotic surgery groups, although at the cost of an increase in total operative time, without appreciating the differences in terms of serious surgical complications (Clavien III-V). (4) Conclusions: Robotic partial nephrectomy is a safe procedure, with a shorter learning curve than laparoscopic surgery and with all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Indexed as

laparoscopicpartial nephrectomyrobotic

Identifiers

PMID36980679
PMCPMC10046669
OpenAlexW4327601571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.