Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980640›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Diagnosis in Madrid (Spain) Based on the RTMAD Tumor Registry (2019-2021).

Gregorio Garrido-Cantero, Federico Longo, Javier Hernández-González, Ángel Pueyo, Tomás Fernández-Aparicio, Juan F Dorado, Javier C Angulo, On Behalf Of The Madrid Cancer Registry Rtmad Investigators

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gregorio Garrido-CanteroOficina Regional de Coordinación Oncológica, Consejería de Sanidad, Comunidad de Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 280, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Federico LongoOficina Regional de Coordinación Oncológica, Consejería de Sanidad, Comunidad de Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 280, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-2188
Javier Hernández-GonzálezOficina Regional de Coordinación Oncológica, Consejería de Sanidad, Comunidad de Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 280, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Ángel PueyoFundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica (FIIB) de los Hospitales Universitarios Infanta Leonor y Sureste, 28003 Madrid, Spain.
Tomás Fernández-AparicioServicio de Urología, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Av. Marqués de los Vélez s/n, 30008 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5925-4900
Juan F DoradoPeRTICA Análisis Estadísticos, Av. Leonardo Da Vinci, 8, Getafe, 28906 Madrid, Spain.
Javier C AnguloDepartamento Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Europea, 28005 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-8792
On Behalf Of The Madrid Cancer Registry Rtmad Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a significant disruption to cancer diagnosis, treatment and prevention worldwide that could have serious consequences in the near future. We intend to evaluate the weight of this backlog on a community-wide scale in Madrid during the period 2020-2021, and whether a stage shift towards the advanced stage has occurred. Cancer diagnoses in the Madrid tumor registry (RTMAD) from 2019-2021 were evaluated. Absolute and percentage differences in annual volume and observed-to-expected (O/E) volume ratios were calculated. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the O/E ratio. The SIR for 2020-2021 compared to 2019 was 94.5% (95% CI 93.8-95.3), with unequal gender-specific cancer diagnosis recovery (88.5% for males and 102.1% for females). Most cancer types were underdiagnosed in 2020. The tendency worsened in 2021 for colorectal and prostate cancers (87.8%), but lung cancer recovered (102.1%) and breast cancer was over-diagnosed (114.4%) compared with reference pre-COVID-19 data. These changes have modified the ranking of the most frequent malignancies diagnosed in Madrid. Breast cancer has overtaken colorectal and prostate cancers, displaced to second and third position, respectively. Not only was colorectal cancer diagnosis affected more as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic but diagnosis of this malignancy at the advance stage also increased by 3.6% in 2020 and 4.2% in 2021 compared to the reference period of 2019. In summary, there is a large volume of undetected cancer in Madrid caused by the reduced access to care secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic, especially regarding colorectal and prostate cancer. Strategies are needed to recover the backlog of diagnoses and effectively treat these cases in the future and solve the negative impact that will be caused by the diagnostic delay. Analyzing the impact of new diagnoses suffered by each different malignancy and their recovery will help to understand how the future allocation of resources should look.

Indexed as

cancer diagnosiscoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)stage shiftundetected cancer

Identifiers

PMID36980640
PMCPMC10046347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.