Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980628›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Refining the Characterization and Outcome of Pathological Complete Responders after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Lessons from the Randomized Phase III VESPER (GETUG-AFU V05) Trial.

Stéphane Culine, Valentin Harter, Clémentine Krucker, Gwenaelle Gravis, Aude Fléchon, Christine Chevreau, Hakim Mahammedi, Brigitte Laguerre, Aline Guillot, Florence Joly and 4 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Stéphane CulineDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Nord, Université de Paris Cité, Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-2637
Valentin HarterNorth-West Canceropole Data Center, Baclesse Cancer Center, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6545-8130
Clémentine KruckerCNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
Gwenaelle GravisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmette Institute, 13009 Marseille, France.
Aude FléchonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, 69008 Lyon, France.
Christine ChevreauDepartment of Medical Oncology, ICR-IUCT Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Hakim MahammediDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jean Perrin Cancer Center, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Brigitte LaguerreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Eugène Marquis Cancer Center, 35042 Rennes, France.
Aline GuillotDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France.
Florence JolyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Baclesse Cancer Center, 14000 Caen, France.
Jacqueline FontugneCNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9919-1641
Yves AlloryCNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-077X
Christian PfisterDepartment of Urology, Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm 1404, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5920-4468
VESPER Trial Investigators
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCentre François Baclesse · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FRInserm · FRInstitute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is the optimal treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In recent years, the VESPER trial showed a statistically significant higher progression-free survival with dd-MVAC (dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) compared to GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin). In the present report, we refine the characterization and outcome of patients whose cystectomy specimens were pathologically free of cancer (pathological complete response, pCR). We confirm that these patients portend a better outcome as compared to patients with invasive disease (≥pT1N0) at cystectomy. Nested variant and lymphovascular invasion were identified as adverse predictive factors of pCR. Progression-free survival probability three years after pCR on cystectomy was about 85%, regardless of the NAC regimen. A lower creatinine clearance and the delivery of less than four cycles were associated with a higher risk of relapse. Predicting the efficacy of NAC remains a major challenge. The planned analysis of molecular subtypes in the VESPER trial could help predict which patients may achieve complete response and better outcome.

Indexed as

cisplatin-based chemotherapymuscle-invasive bladder cancerneoadjuvant treatmentpathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID36980628
PMCPMC10046214
OpenAlexW4324144335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read39
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.