Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980613›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Role of the Molecular Tumor Board for the Personalized Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Focus on the State of the Art in Italy.

Azzurra Irelli, Sofia Chiatamone Ranieri, Daniela Di Giacomo, Sara Malatesta, Leonardo Valerio Patruno, Alessandra Tessitore, Edoardo Alesse, Katia Cannita

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Precision Oncology in Older Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Azzurra IrelliMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-6297
Sofia Chiatamone RanieriPathology Unit, Department of Services, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-5894
Daniela Di GiacomoPathology Unit, Department of Services, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Sara MalatestaPathology Unit, Department of Services, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Leonardo Valerio PatrunoMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Alessandra TessitoreDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Edoardo AlesseDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Katia CannitaMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, AUSL 04 Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
University of Teramo · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) are multidisciplinary groups that combine molecular and clinical data from cancer patients in order to formulate treatment recommendations for precision medicine. To date, there is insufficient data to support the use of singleplex or next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies to select first-line therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but considering the high number of level II alterations, according to the ESMO scale for clinical actionability of molecular targets (ESCAT), it is suggested to include patients in molecular screening programs in order to be able to offer targeted therapies for specific genomic alterations. This article aims at reviewing the most recent literature related to the most used methodologies/approaches for molecular diagnostics and variants' classification, summarizing the internationally published molecular screening studies in support of MTB activity and, in the end, discussing MTBs' current position and role in Italy, the number of which is increasing, also thanks to the thrust of institutions.

Indexed as

agnostic anticancer drugsgenomic alterationsmetastatic breast cancermolecular tumor boardnext-generation sequencingprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID36980613
PMCPMC10046335
OpenAlexW4324066617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read130
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.