Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980569›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Optical Genome Mapping for Cytogenetic Diagnostics in AML.

Verena Nilius-Eliliwi, Wanda M Gerding, Roland Schroers, Huu Phuc Nguyen, Deepak B Vangala

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Compound HeterozygousInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Verena Nilius-EliliwiCenter for Hemato-Oncological Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44892 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9698-1779
Wanda M GerdingHuman Genetics, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-9872
Roland SchroersCenter for Hemato-Oncological Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44892 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2744-5491
Huu Phuc NguyenHuman Genetics, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-788X
Deepak B VangalaCenter for Hemato-Oncological Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44892 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4175-5683
Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification and risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is based on reliable genetic diagnostics. A broad and expanding variety of relevant aberrations are structural variants beyond single-nucleotide variants. Optical Genome Mapping is an unbiased, genome-wide, amplification-free method for the detection of structural variants. In this review, the current knowledge of Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) with regard to diagnostics in hematological malignancies in general, and AML in specific, is summarized. Furthermore, this review focuses on the ability of OGM to expand the use of cytogenetic diagnostics in AML and perhaps even replace older techniques such as chromosomal-banding analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, or copy number variation microarrays. Finally, OGM is compared to amplification-based techniques and a brief outlook for future directions is given.

Indexed as

AMLcytogeneticsOptical Genome MappingWGSwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36980569
PMCPMC10046241
OpenAlexW4323853802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read57
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.