Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980463›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Grade Classification of Tumors from Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Deep Learning Technique.

Saravanan Srinivasan, Prabin Selvestar Mercy Bai, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, Venkatesan Muthukumaran, Jyothi Chinna Babu, Lucia Vilcekova

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saravanan SrinivasanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7884-3532
Prabin Selvestar Mercy BaiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9660-2943
Sandeep Kumar MathivananSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-1197
Venkatesan MuthukumaranDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-5596
Jyothi Chinna BabuDepartment of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Rajampet 516126, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9005-0615
Lucia VilcekovaFaculty of Management, Comenius University Bratislava, Odbojarov 10, 820 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the accuracy of tumor identification, it is necessary to develop a reliable automated diagnostic method. In order to precisely categorize brain tumors, researchers developed a variety of segmentation algorithms. Segmentation of brain images is generally recognized as one of the most challenging tasks in medical image processing. In this article, a novel automated detection and classification method was proposed. The proposed approach consisted of many phases, including pre-processing MRI images, segmenting images, extracting features, and classifying images. During the pre-processing portion of an MRI scan, an adaptive filter was utilized to eliminate background noise. For feature extraction, the local-binary grey level co-occurrence matrix (LBGLCM) was used, and for image segmentation, enhanced fuzzy c-means clustering (EFCMC) was used. After extracting the scan features, we used a deep learning model to classify MRI images into two groups: glioma and normal. The classifications were created using a convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN). The proposed technique improved brain image classification from a defined input dataset. MRI scans from the REMBRANDT dataset, which consisted of 620 testing and 2480 training sets, were used for the research. The data demonstrate that the newly proposed method outperformed its predecessors. The proposed CRNN strategy was compared against BP, U-Net, and ResNet, which are three of the most prevalent classification approaches currently being used. For brain tumor classification, the proposed system outcomes were 98.17% accuracy, 91.34% specificity, and 98.79% sensitivity.

Indexed as

convolution recurrent neural networkenhanced fuzzy c-means clusteringimage classificationlocal-binary grey level co-occurrence matrixmagnetic resonance image

Identifiers

PMID36980463
PMCPMC10046932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read32
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.