ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Comparison of 3D Bone Position Estimation Using QR Code and Metal Bead Markers.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of a 3D bone position estimation system that displays 3D images in response to changes in the position of fluoroscopic images, modified markers using quick response (QR) codes were developed. The aims of this study were to assess the accuracy of the estimated bone position on 3D images with reference to QR code markers on fluoroscopic images and to compare its accuracy with metal bead markers. Bone positions were estimated from reference points on a fluoroscopic image compared with those on a 3D image. The positional relationships of QR code and metal bead markers on the fluoroscopic image were compared with those on the 3D image in order to establish whether a 3D image may be drawn by tracking positional changes in radius models. Differences were investigated by comparing the distance between markers on the fluoroscopic image and that on the 3D image, which was projected on the monitor. The error ratio, which was defined as the difference in the measurement between the fluoroscopic and 3D images divided by the fluoroscopic measurement, was compared between QR code and metal bead markers. Error ratios for the QR code markers were 5.0 ± 2.0%, 6.4 ± 7.6%, and 1.0 ± 0.8% in the anterior-posterior view, ulnar side lateral view, and posterior-anterior view, respectively. Error ratios for the metal bead markers were 1.3 ± 1.7%, 13.8 ± 14.5%, and 4.7 ± 5.7% in the anterior-posterior view, ulnar side lateral view, and posterior-anterior view, respectively. The error ratio for the metal bead markers was smaller in the initial position (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.