Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980388›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Role of MRI in the Diagnosis of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas and Its Mimickers: A Case-Based Review with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis.

Jelena Djokic Kovac, Aleksandra Djikic-Rom, Aleksandar Bogdanovic, Aleksandra Jankovic, Nikica Grubor, Goran Djuricic, Vladimir Dugalic

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Imaging of pancreatic hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a scoping review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Imaging of non-ductal pancreatic neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jelena Djokic KovacCenter for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No. 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-4826-0218
Aleksandra Djikic-RomDepartament of Pathology, Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No. 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandar BogdanovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6790-7892
Aleksandra JankovicCenter for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No. 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Nikica GruborFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Goran DjuricicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8066-5701
Vladimir DugalicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSUniverzitetski Klinički Centar Srbije · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is rare pancreatic tumor occurring most commonly in young females. The typical imaging appearance of SPN is of well-defined, encapsulated, and large heterogeneous tumors, consisting of solid and cystic components due to various degrees of intralesional hemorrhage and necrosis. However, atypical imaging presentation in the form of small solid tumors or uniformly cystic lesions might also be seen, which can be explained by specific pathological characteristics. Other imaging features such as a round shape, the absence of main pancreatic duct dilatation, and slow growth, in combination with vague symptoms, favor the diagnosis of SPNs. Nevertheless, the radiological findings of SPN might overlap with other solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms, such as neuroendocrine tumors, serous and mucinous neoplasms, and even small pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In addition, a few benign non-tumorous conditions including walled-of-necrosis, and intrapancreatic accessory spleen may also pose diagnostic dilemmas simulating SPNs on imaging studies. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of the typical and atypical imaging features of SPNs and to describe useful tips for differential diagnosis with its potential mimickers.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingmimickerssolid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID36980388
PMCPMC10046973
OpenAlexW4324143926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read19
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.