ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Puncture for the Patients with Pancreatic Masses.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and CA19-9 Added to EUS-FNA for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of standardWorld journal of methodology · 2025Article
- EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB in Pancreatic Solid Lesions ≤ 15 mm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Opportunities and Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful for the diagnosis of pancreatic masses. According to three meta-analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA are 84-92%, 96-98%, and 86-91%, respectively. However, the occurrence of false-negative and false-positive results indicates that the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA needs to be improved. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) is used for the characterization of pancreatic masses and can be applied to improve the performance of EUS-FNA. When CH-EUS is used to evaluate intratumor blood flow, an avascular area inside the pancreatic mass that is considered to be fibrosis is often detected. This area can be avoided by performing EUS-FNA under CH-EUS guidance. In this review, we summarize the data on contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (CH-EUS-FNA), which suggest that its benefit is still a matter of debate. Of eight studies analyzed, only one showed that CH-EUS improved the sensitivity of EUS-FNA. The future challenge is to determine under what circumstances CH-EUS-FNA is useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.