Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980095›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Applying Universal Principles of 'Best Interest': Practice Challenges across Transnational Jurisdictions, Cultural Norms, and Values.

Brian Littlechild, Carolyn Housman

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian LittlechildBrian Littlechild, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-813X
Carolyn HousmanChildren and Families across Borders, London SW1W 9SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1174-3224
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

Esmée Fairbairn Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article sets out key issues in determining and upholding the best interests of children, in need of social service support, who have family networks that span outside of the UK. These issues are then analysed against whether and how child protection professionals take these into account along with an overall consideration of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's (UNCRC) 'best interests of the child', when assessing and planning for those needs in kinship care cases. Building on these themes, the findings of an exploratory study on international kinship care cases carried out by Children and Families Across Borders (CFAB), the UK branch of the non-governmental organisation, International Social Service, as well as CFAB's associated Freedom of Information Requests to the UK government, are examined. These are then analysed in relation to legal and policy documents in England. Agency case records are analysed to identify a range of factors for children placed with 'kinship' carers across national borders, relating to the cultural relativity of the 'best interest' principle, the availability of family support in different social service structures, the understanding and application of legislation and policy in transnational contexts, and the availability of markers to track and analyse the scale of children crossing borders to join family.

Indexed as

best interestschild protectionchildren’s needsinternational placementskinship caretransnational children’s worktrauma

Identifiers

PMID36980095
PMCPMC10047076
OpenAlexW4324054282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.