Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980017›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Maxilla-Mandibular Discrepancies through Soft-Tissue References: Reliability and Validation of the Anteroposterior Measurement.

Cinzia Maspero, Niccolò Cenzato, Francesco Inchingolo, Maria Grazia Cagetti, Gaetano Isola, Davide Sozzi, Massimo Del Fabbro, Gianluca Martino Tartaglia

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cinzia MasperoDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5930-1698
Niccolò CenzatoDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Francesco InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883
Maria Grazia CagettiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2704-0585
Gaetano IsolaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4267-6992
Davide SozziDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6281-5307
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-0984
Gianluca Martino TartagliaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research aimed to identify a new measurement to diagnose the sagittal maxillary and mandibular difference that considers the patient's profile (soft tissue Wits appraisal: obtained by projecting points A and B on the occlusal plane and subsequently measuring the linear distance between the two points). This new measurement was compared to the conventional Wits appraisal obtained to diagnose sagittal jaw discrepancy. In total, 300 subjects (162 males, 138 females) aged between 6 and 50 years requiring orthodontic treatment were analyzed. The cephalometric tracings on the pre-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained and the two measurements taken were the Wits appraisal and a new measurement which were both calculated and compared. The analysis of the linear correlations between the conventional Wits value and the measurement obtained on the soft-tissue were undertaken. The relevance was established at 5% (

Indexed as

Angle’s malocclusions skeletal classificationcephalometric diagnosisorthodontic discrepancyWits appraisal

Identifiers

PMID36980017
PMCPMC10047694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.