Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980001›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Tocolytic Therapy Inhibiting Preterm Birth in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Noyuri Yamaji, Hitomi Suzuki, Kana Saito, Toshiyuki Swa, Fumihiko Namba, Joshua P Vogel, Jenny A Ramson, Jenny Cao, Lavin Tina, Erika Ota

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Associations ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Noyuri YamajiGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4212-6723
Hitomi SuzukiGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1747-7601
Kana SaitoSaitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7781-1870
Toshiyuki SwaSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6753-7572
Fumihiko NambaSaitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.
Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Jenny A RamsonMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Jenny CaoMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-8277
Lavin TinaUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Erika OtaGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3945-7441
Burnet Institute · AUSt. Luke's International University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPOsaka Health Science University · JPWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to identify the benefits and possible harms of tocolytic therapy for preterm labour management in the context of pregnant women with extremely preterm birth, multiple gestations, or growth-restricted foetuses. A comprehensive search using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and the WHO Global Index Medicus databases was conducted from 10 to 15 July 2021. We included randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies that assessed the effects of tocolysis compared with placebo or no treatment. We found 744 reports and, finally, nine studies (three randomized controlled trials and six cohort studies) pertaining to women with <28 weeks of gestation were included. No eligible studies were identified among women with a multiple pregnancy or a growth-restricted foetus. A meta-analysis of the trial data showed that there were no clear differences in perinatal death nor for a delay in birth. Non-randomized evidence showed that tocolysis delayed birth by 7 days, though there was no clear difference for preterm birth. In summary, it remains unclear whether tocolytic therapy for inhibiting preterm labour is beneficial for these subgroups of women and their newborns. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials and observational studies are needed to address the lack of evidence regarding tocolytic agents in these populations.

Indexed as

extremely preterm birthgrowth-restricted foetusesmultiple gestationspreterm birthsystematic reviewtocolytic therapy

Identifiers

PMID36980001
PMCPMC10047044
OpenAlexW4322500917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read30
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.