Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979935›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

The Significance of Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and Metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) in Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Jacek Kudelski, Anna Tokarzewicz, Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Barbara Mroczko, Piotr Chłosta, Marta Bruczko-Goralewska, Przemysław Mitura, Grzegorz Młynarczyk

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacek KudelskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24A St., 15-276 Białystok, Poland.
Anna TokarzewiczDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Białystok, Adama Mickiewicza 2C St., 15-089 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-2433
Monika Gudowska-SawczukDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Białystok, Waszyngtona 15A St., 15-269 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4854-7155
Barbara MroczkoDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Białystok, Waszyngtona 15A St., 15-269 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4075-8479
Piotr ChłostaDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 St., 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
Marta Bruczko-GoralewskaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Białystok, Adama Mickiewicza 2C St., 15-089 Białystok, Poland.
Przemysław MituraDepartment of Urology and Oncological Urology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-4490
Grzegorz MłynarczykDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24A St., 15-276 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-8501
Medical University of Białystok · PLJagiellonian University · PLMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrinary bladder cancer is a serious oncological problem that is the cause of many deaths worldwide. The processes of metastasis and origination of local tumor invasion depend on the extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. The cancer microenvironment, particularly the ECM, may be considered a key factor in cancer progression. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are classified as the main factors responsible for the degradation of ECM components. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 (MMP-2 and MMP-9) in urinary bladder cancer according to different stages. MATERIAL AND

methodsUrinary bladder tissue samples were analyzed. Cancer patients were divided into two groups: low-grade tumors (LG; Group I) and high-grade tumors (HG; Group II). Control tissue was obtained from the opposite site to the tumor. MMPs content and activity (actual and specific) were evaluated using ELISA and Western blot methods, respectively.

resultsBoth MMPs are present in high and low molecular complexes in healthy or bladder cancer tissues. The content of MMP-9 is enhanced in comparison with MMP-2, particularly in HG cancer tissue. The actual activity of MMP-2 was highest in LG cancer tissue whereas the actual activity of MMP-9 was highest in HG cancer. Specific activity of both MMPs was highest in LG cancer, but the activity of MMP-9 was higher in comparison with MMP-2.

conclusionsIn conclusion, the content and specific activity of MMP-9 were increased in comparison with MMP-2. The revealed differences in content and activity of both MMPs demonstrate their different participation in ECM remodeling at different stages of cancer development. Moreover, it seems that MMP-9 has higher clinical utility than MMP-2 as a potential therapeutic option and a diagnostic biomarker of urinary bladder cancer.

Indexed as

biomarkergelatinaseMMP-2MMP-9urinary bladder carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36979935
PMCPMC10046406
OpenAlexW4328104967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read29
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.