Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979921›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Improved Object Detection Artificial Intelligence Using the Revised RetinaNet Model for the Automatic Detection of Ulcerations, Vascular Lesions, and Tumors in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy.

Ayako Nakada, Ryota Niikura, Keita Otani, Yusuke Kurose, Yoshito Hayashi, Kazuya Kitamura, Hiroyoshi Nakanishi, Seiji Kawano, Testuya Honda, Kenkei Hasatani and 7 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ayako NakadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138655, Japan.
Ryota NiikuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138655, Japan.
Keita OtaniResearch Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1538904, Japan.
Yusuke KuroseResearch Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1538904, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9763-7483
Yoshito HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 5650871, Japan.
Kazuya KitamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 9208641 Kanazawa, Japan.
Hiroyoshi NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Ishikawa 9208530, Japan.
Seiji KawanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 7008558, Japan.
Testuya HondaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center, 8508555 Nagasaki, Japan.
Kenkei HasataniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 9108526, Japan.
Tetsuya SumiyoshiThe Center for Digestive Disease, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo 0600004, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-8477
Tsutomu NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, 5608565 Toyonaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-9003
Atsuo YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138655, Japan.
Tomonori AokiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138655, Japan.
Tatsuya HaradaResearch Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1538904, Japan.
Takashi KawaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 1600023, Japan.
Mitsuhiro FujishiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138655, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 21cm0106485h0001the Japanese Foundation for Research and Promotion of Endoscopy 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of computer-aided detection models to diagnose lesions in images from wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) is a topical endoscopic diagnostic solution. We revised our artificial intelligence (AI) model, RetinaNet, to better diagnose multiple types of lesions, including erosions and ulcers, vascular lesions, and tumors. RetinaNet was trained using the data of 1234 patients, consisting of images of 6476 erosions and ulcers, 1916 vascular lesions, 7127 tumors, and 14,014,149 normal tissues. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for each lesion were evaluated using five-fold stratified cross-validation. Each cross-validation set consisted of between 6,647,148 and 7,267,813 images from 217 patients. The mean AUC values were 0.997 for erosions and ulcers, 0.998 for vascular lesions, and 0.998 for tumors. The mean sensitivities were 0.919, 0.878, and 0.876, respectively. The mean specificities were 0.936, 0.969, and 0.937, and the mean accuracies were 0.930, 0.962, and 0.924, respectively. We developed a new version of an AI-based diagnostic model for the multiclass identification of small bowel lesions in WCE images to help endoscopists appropriately diagnose small intestine diseases in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencesmall intestine erosions and ulcerssmall intestine tumorssmall intestine vascular lesionswireless capsule endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36979921
PMCPMC10046454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.