Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979834›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

The Effect of Early Application of Synthetic Peptides 19-2.5 and 19-4LF to Improve Survival and Neurological Outcome in a Mouse Model of Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation.

Rika Bajorat, Lena Danckert, Florian Ebert, Theresa Bancken, Stefan Bergt, Felix Klawitter, Brigitte Vollmar, Daniel A Reuter, Tobias Schürholz, Johannes Ehler

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rika BajoratDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Lena DanckertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Florian EbertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0627-4953
Theresa BanckenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Stefan BergtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, MEDICLIN Müritz-Klinikum, 17192 Waren, Germany.
Felix KlawitterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Brigitte VollmarInstitute of Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Daniel A ReuterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2080-5597
Tobias SchürholzDepartment of Intensive and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3830-3499
Johannes EhlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7866-9781
University of Rostock · DERems-Murr-Klinikum · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

Rostock University Medical Center FORUN Research Program 889012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The synthetic antimicrobial peptides (sAMPs) Pep19-2.5 and Pep19-4LF have been shown in vitro and in vivo to reduce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to the suppression of inflammation and immunomodulation. We hypothesized that intervention with Pep19-2.5 and Pep19-4LF immediately after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (CA-CPR) might attenuate immediate systemic inflammation, survival, and long-term outcomes in a standardized mouse model of CA-CPR. Long-term outcomes up to 28 days were assessed between a control group (saline) and two peptide intervention groups. Primarily, survival as well as neurological and cognitive parameters were assessed. In addition, systemic inflammatory molecules and specific biomarkers were analyzed in plasma as well as in brain tissue. Treatment with sAMPs did not provide any short- or long-term benefits for either survival or neurological outcomes, and no significant benefit on inflammation in the CA-CPR animal model. While no difference was found in the plasma analysis of early cytokines between the intervention groups four hours after resuscitation, a significant increase in UCH-L1, a biomarker of neuronal damage and blood-brain barrier rupture, was measured in the Pep19-4LF-treated group. The theoretical benefit of both sAMPs tested here for the treatment of post-cardiac arrest syndrome could not be proven.

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptidebiomarkerbrain injurycardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationneurological outcomeneurological testsPep19-2.5Pep19-4LFUCH-L1

Identifiers

PMID36979834
PMCPMC10045145
OpenAlexW4324054866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read70
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.