ArticleBiomedicines2023
Machine Learning: Using Xception, a Deep Convolutional Neural Network Architecture, to Implement Pectus Excavatum Diagnostic Tool from Frontal-View Chest X-rays.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing pectus excavatum diagnosis with an automated batch evaluation tool for chest computed tomography images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Application of Deep Learning for the Segmentation and Classification of Coronary Arteries.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pectus excavatum (PE), a chest-wall deformity that can compromise cardiopulmonary function, cannot be detected by a radiologist through frontal chest radiography without a lateral view or chest computed tomography. This study aims to train a convolutional neural network (CNN), a deep learning architecture with powerful image processing ability, for PE screening through frontal chest radiography, which is the most common imaging test in current hospital practice. Posteroanterior-view chest images of PE and normal patients were collected from our hospital to build the database. Among them, 80% were used as the training set used to train the established CNN algorithm, Xception, whereas the remaining 20% were a test set for model performance evaluation. The performance of our diagnostic artificial intelligence model ranged between 0.976-1 under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The test accuracy of the model reached 0.989, and the sensitivity and specificity were 96.66 and 96.64, respectively. Our study is the first to prove that a CNN can be trained as a diagnostic tool for PE using frontal chest X-rays, which is not possible by the human eye. It offers a convenient way to screen potential candidates for the surgical repair of PE, primarily using available image examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.