Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979582›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2023

Optical Biosensors and Their Applications for the Detection of Water Pollutants.

Marcela Herrera-Domínguez, Gesuri Morales-Luna, Jürgen Mahlknecht, Quan Cheng, Iris Aguilar-Hernández, Nancy Ornelas-Soto

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Advances in Diagnostic Modalities forLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcela Herrera-DomínguezTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Gesuri Morales-LunaDepartamento de Física y Matemáticas, Universidad Iberoamericana, Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 880, Mexico City 01219, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-3094
Jürgen MahlknechtTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Quan ChengDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Iris Aguilar-HernándezTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Nancy Ornelas-SotoTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MXIbero American University · MXUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología # CN-20-258Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología # PN2016-4320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The correct detection and quantification of pollutants in water is key to regulating their presence in the environment. Biosensors offer several advantages, such as minimal sample preparation, short measurement times, high specificity and sensibility and low detection limits. The purpose of this review is to explore the different types of optical biosensors, focusing on their biological elements and their principle of operation, as well as recent applications in the detection of pollutants in water. According to our literature review, 33% of the publications used fluorescence-based biosensors, followed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with 28%. So far, SPR biosensors have achieved the best results in terms of detection limits. Although less common (22%), interferometers and resonators (4%) are also highly promising due to the low detection limits that can be reached using these techniques. In terms of biological recognition elements, 43% of the published works focused on antibodies due to their high affinity and stability, although they could be replaced with molecularly imprinted polymers. This review offers a unique compilation of the most recent work in the specific area of optical biosensing for water monitoring, focusing on both the biological element and the transducer used, as well as the type of target contaminant. Recent technological advances are discussed.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesEnvironmental PollutantsWater PollutantsMolecularly Imprinted PolymersSurface Plasmon ResonanceEnvironmental PollutantsMolecularly Imprinted PolymersWater Pollutantsemerging contaminantsfiber optic biosensorsheavy metals in waterinterferometersoptical biosensorsresonatorsSPR biosensorwaterborne pathogenswater monitoringwater pollutants

Identifiers

PMID36979582
PMCPMC10046542
OpenAlexW4324058159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read32
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.