Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979528›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2023

Nucleic Acid Quantification by Multi-Frequency Impedance Cytometry and Machine Learning.

Mahtab Kokabi, Jianye Sui, Neeru Gandotra, Arastou Pournadali Khamseh, Curt Scharfe, Mehdi Javanmard

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahtab KokabiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Jianye SuiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Neeru GandotraDepartment of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Arastou Pournadali KhamsehDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Curt ScharfeDepartment of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6322-2039
Mehdi JavanmardDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USYale University · US

Funding

Multiplex gene sequencing and metabolomics analysis from newborn dried blood spots to improve screening and diagnosis of metabolic disorders.R01HD102537 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHARFE, CURT · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD102537National Science Foundation 1711165National Science Foundation 1846740National Science Foundation 2002511NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining nucleic acid concentrations in a sample is an important step prior to proceeding with downstream analysis in molecular diagnostics. Given the need for testing DNA amounts and its purity in many samples, including in samples with very small input DNA, there is utility of novel machine learning approaches for accurate and high-throughput DNA quantification. Here, we demonstrated the ability of a neural network to predict DNA amounts coupled to paramagnetic beads. To this end, a custom-made microfluidic chip is applied to detect DNA molecules bound to beads by measuring the impedance peak response (IPR) at multiple frequencies. We leveraged electrical measurements including the frequency and imaginary and real parts of the peak intensity within a microfluidic channel as the input of deep learning models to predict DNA concentration. Specifically, 10 different deep learning architectures are examined. The results of the proposed regression model indicate that an R_Squared of 97% with a slope of 0.68 is achievable. Consequently, machine learning models can be a suitable, fast, and accurate method to measure nucleic acid concentration in a sample. The results presented in this study demonstrate the ability of the proposed neural network to use the information embedded in raw impedance data to predict the amount of DNA concentration.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerDNAElectric ImpedanceMicrofluidicsDNAbiosensorimpedance cytometrymachine learningmicrofluidic chipnucleic acid concentrationregression model

Identifiers

PMID36979528
PMCPMC10046493
OpenAlexW4321786787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read17
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.