Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979462›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2023

Comparison of Biomolecular Condensate Localization and Protein Phase Separation Predictors.

Erich R Kuechler, Alex Huang, Jennifer M Bui, Thibault Mayor, Jörg Gsponer

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Shift of the insoluble content of the proteome in the aging mouse brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. AlphaFold2-based prediction of the co-condensation propensity of proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erich R KuechlerMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Alex HuangMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Jennifer M BuiMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Thibault MayorMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Jörg GsponerMichael Smith Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Funding

CIHR AWD-017620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in the field of biochemistry and cellular biology has entered a new phase due to the discovery of phase separation driving the formation of biomolecular condensates, or membraneless organelles, in cells. The implications of this novel principle of cellular organization are vast and can be applied at multiple scales, spawning exciting research questions in numerous directions. Of fundamental importance are the molecular mechanisms that underly biomolecular condensate formation within cells and whether insights gained into these mechanisms provide a gateway for accurate predictions of protein phase behavior. Within the last six years, a significant number of predictors for protein phase separation and condensate localization have emerged. Herein, we compare a collection of state-of-the-art predictors on different tasks related to protein phase behavior. We show that the tested methods achieve high AUCs in the identification of biomolecular condensate drivers and scaffolds, as well as in the identification of proteins able to phase separate in vitro. However, our benchmark tests reveal that their performance is poorer when used to predict protein segments that are involved in phase separation or to classify amino acid substitutions as phase-separation-promoting or -inhibiting mutations. Our results suggest that the phenomenological approach used by most predictors is insufficient to fully grasp the complexity of the phenomenon within biological contexts and make reliable predictions related to protein phase behavior at the residue level.

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesProteinsAmino Acid SubstitutionCytoplasmOrganellesProteinsintrinsically disordered proteinsprediction methodsprotein phase separation

Identifiers

PMID36979462
PMCPMC10046894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read11
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.