Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979400›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2023

CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Promising Cell Therapy.

Xi-Wen Zhang, Yi-Shi Wu, Tian-Min Xu, Man-Hua Cui

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xi-Wen ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China.
Yi-Shi WuDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China.
Tian-Min XuDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China.
Man-Hua CuiDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7694-6917
Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) is among the most common gynecologic malignancies with a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage (stage III or IV), with 5-year survival rates ranging from 25% to 47% worldwide. Surgical resection and first-line chemotherapy are the main treatment modalities for OC. However, patients usually relapse within a few years of initial treatment due to resistance to chemotherapy. Cell-based therapies, particularly adoptive T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, represent an alternative immunotherapy approach with great potential for hematologic malignancies. However, the use of CAR-T-cell therapy for the treatment of OC is still associated with several difficulties. In this review, we comprehensively discuss recent innovations in CAR-T-cell engineering to improve clinical efficacy, as well as strategies to overcome the limitations of CAR-T-cell therapy in OC.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyFemaleHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCARCAR-Timmunotherapyovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID36979400
PMCPMC10046142
OpenAlexW4323043116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read5
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.