Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979353›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2023

Photobiomodulation for Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Patients.

Daša Hafner, Petra Hrast, Tanja Tomaževič, Janez Jazbec, Marko Kavčič

Registry-linked trialFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06623305 (Photobiomodulation Therapy for the Prevention of Mucositis in Pediatric Oncology Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06623305 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Photobiomodulation Therapy for the Prevention of Mucositis in Pediatric Oncology Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsMucositis OralArmsPhotobiomodulation for prevention arm, Photobiomodulation for exploratory arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acceptance and perceived efficacy of intraoral versus extraoral photobiomodulation for oral mucositis prevention in pediatric patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daša HafnerFaculty of Medicine, The University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Petra HrastFaculty of Medicine, The University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tanja TomaževičDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dental Clinic, University Medical Center Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Janez JazbecDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marko KavčičDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Division of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common side effect in patients undergoing chemotherapy (CT), especially in children due to their rapid epithelial mitotic rate. It has been associated with a significant reduction in life quality since it leads to pain, an inadequate intake of nutrients, an increased risk of opportunistic infections, and interruptions of CT. Photobiomodulation (PMB) with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has shown faster healing, reduction in pain, and the reduced use of analgesic compared to placebo groups. The purpose of this review is to analyze and compare the existing clinical trials and identify their shortcomings in hope to make future research easier. Using MeSH terms and keywords, the Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases we searched for the period of the last 5 years. We identified a total of 15 clinical trials, with a total of 929 pediatric patients analyzed in this review. We compared different light sources and other laser technique characteristics used in clinical trials such as wavelength, energy and power density, spot size, irradiation time, PBM protocol, and OM evaluation. The main findings show inconsistent laser parameter quotations, differences in the PBM protocol along with a laser application technique, and a lack of clinical trials. Based on that, more studies with a high methodological quality should be conducted in order to provide a unified PBM protocol suitable for the pediatric population.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsLow-Level Light TherapyStomatitisChildHumansQuality of LifeAntineoplastic Agentschemotherapylow-level laser therapyoral mucositisoral stomatitispediatric oncologypediatric populationphotobiomodulation

Identifiers

PMID36979353
PMCPMC10046229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read13
measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.