Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979289›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Telerehabilitation Pathways in Specific Learning Disorders: Improving Reading and Writing.

Agnese Capodieci, Daniela Graziani, Valentina Scali, Susanna Giaccherini, Luciano Luccherino, Chiara Pecini

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agnese CapodieciDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2165-6899
Daniela GrazianiDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Valentina ScaliAzienda USL Toscana Sudest, 52100 Arezzo, Italy.
Susanna GiaccheriniAzienda USL Toscana Sudest, 52100 Arezzo, Italy.
Luciano LuccherinoAzienda USL Toscana Sudest, 52100 Arezzo, Italy.
Chiara PeciniDepartment of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-7884
Azienda Usl 8 Arezzo · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telerehabilitation has proved to be a useful tool for neurodevelopmental disorders in allowing timely and intensive intervention and preventing relapses; it is also widely used for specific learning disabilities (SLD), showing significant effects on reading abilities, but variables linked to its effectiveness have not been studied yet. The present study was aimed at testing the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on reading and writing in SLD children, comparing different treatment pathways, and considering the impact of training intensity and executive functions. Seventy-three children were enrolled (telerehabilitation group: 48 children, waiting list group: 25 children). The results showed significant improvements in reading fluency, text dictation, and executive functions in the training group. Children attending a combined training including reading tasks and rapid automatized naming processes improved in word reading fluency and text dictation. The number of training sessions and the change in executive functions significantly correlated with changes in reading accuracy. Here we show a new contribution to telerehabilitation research in SLD: telerehabilitation significantly enhanced learning abilities and executive functions. Training based on the learning task and the underlying processes significantly increased not only reading speed, according to previous studies, but also writing accuracy. The findings' implications in clinical research and practice are discussed.

Indexed as

cognitive flexibilitydictationexecutive functionsinterference controlneurodevelopmental disordersreading accuracyreading speedspecific learning disordertelerehabilitationwriting accuracy

Identifiers

PMID36979289
PMCPMC10046886
OpenAlexW4324058089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.