Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979133›Full record

ArticleBiology2023

Effect of Explant Source on Phenotypic Changes of In Vitro Grown Cannabis Plantlets over Multiple Subcultures.

Mohsen Hesami, Kristian Adamek, Marco Pepe, Andrew Maxwell Phineas Jones

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Plant Tissue Culture: A Short-Term Conservation Tool.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Importance of Media Composition and Explant Type inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Morphological Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsen HesamiDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5289-1835
Kristian AdamekDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7356-3064
Marco PepeDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3016-6285
Andrew Maxwell Phineas JonesDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-5341

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council ALLRP555969-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-type cannabis is often multiplied using micropropagation methods to produce genetically uniform and disease/insect-free crops. However, micropropagated plantlets often exhibit phenotypic variation, leading to culture decline over time. In cannabis, the source of these changes remains unknown, though several factors (e.g., explant's sources and prolonged in vitro culture) can result in such phenotypical variations. The study presented herein evaluates the effects of explant sources (i.e., nodal segments derived from the basal, near-basal, middle, and apical parts of the greenhouse-grown mother plant) over multiple subcultures (4 subcultures during 235 days) on multiplication parameters and leaf morphological traits of in vitro cannabis plantlets. While initial in vitro responses were similar among explants sourced from different regions of the plant, there were significant differences in performance over the course of multiple subcultures. Specifically, explant source and/or the number of subcultures significantly impacted plantlet height, number of nodes, and canopy surface area. The explants derived from the basal and near-basal parts of the plant resulted in the tallest shoots with the greatest number of nodes, while the explants derived from the middle and apical regions led to shorter shoots with fewer nodes. Moreover, the basal-derived explants produced cannabis plantlets with shorter but wider leaves which demonstrated the potential of such explants for in vitro rejuvenation practices with minimal culture decline. This study provides new evidence into the long-term impacts of explant source in cannabis micropropagation.

Indexed as

biotechnologyculture declineleaf morphologymarijuanamultiplicationplant tissue cultureprolonged culturerejuvenationsomaclonal variation

Identifiers

PMID36979133
PMCPMC10044989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read14
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.