ArticleBiology2023
Effect of Explant Source on Phenotypic Changes of In Vitro Grown Cannabis Plantlets over Multiple Subcultures.
Article in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient propagation protocol and genetic similarity assessment of medicinal cannabis based on photoautotrophic micropropagation.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Plant Tissue Culture: A Short-Term Conservation Tool.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Decoding the cannabis tissue culture puzzle: Machine learning analysis of cannabis in vitro morpho-physiological disorders expands the potential for precision micropropagation.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- In Vitro Regeneration ofGenes · 2025Article
- Modified Media for Repeated In Vitro Cutting Cycles ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimization of in vitro propagation and virus eradication using meristem culture and thermotherapy in two geranium species Pelargonium X hortorum ('Zonal') and Pelargonium × domesticum ('Regal').BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Improvement and Innovation of Cryopreservation and In Vitro Methods in Plant Resource Protection.Biology · 2024Article
- Optimizing cannabis cultivation: an efficient in vitro system for flowering induction.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Importance of Media Composition and Explant Type inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Somatic Mutation Accumulations in Micropropagated Cannabis Are Proportional to the Number of Subcultures.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative restriction enzyme analysis of methylation (CREAM) reveals methylome variability within a clonalFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- Morphological Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prediction and optimization of indirect shoot regeneration of Passiflora caerulea using machine learning and optimization algorithms.BMC biotechnology · 2023Article
- Challenges and potentials of new breeding techniques inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Article
- Enhancing petunia tissue culture efficiency with machine learning: A pathway to improved callogenesis.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug-type cannabis is often multiplied using micropropagation methods to produce genetically uniform and disease/insect-free crops. However, micropropagated plantlets often exhibit phenotypic variation, leading to culture decline over time. In cannabis, the source of these changes remains unknown, though several factors (e.g., explant's sources and prolonged in vitro culture) can result in such phenotypical variations. The study presented herein evaluates the effects of explant sources (i.e., nodal segments derived from the basal, near-basal, middle, and apical parts of the greenhouse-grown mother plant) over multiple subcultures (4 subcultures during 235 days) on multiplication parameters and leaf morphological traits of in vitro cannabis plantlets. While initial in vitro responses were similar among explants sourced from different regions of the plant, there were significant differences in performance over the course of multiple subcultures. Specifically, explant source and/or the number of subcultures significantly impacted plantlet height, number of nodes, and canopy surface area. The explants derived from the basal and near-basal parts of the plant resulted in the tallest shoots with the greatest number of nodes, while the explants derived from the middle and apical regions led to shorter shoots with fewer nodes. Moreover, the basal-derived explants produced cannabis plantlets with shorter but wider leaves which demonstrated the potential of such explants for in vitro rejuvenation practices with minimal culture decline. This study provides new evidence into the long-term impacts of explant source in cannabis micropropagation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.