Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979043›Full record

ArticleBiology2023

Use of GnRH-Encapsulated Chitosan Nanoparticles as an Alternative to eCG for Induction of Estrus and Ovulation during Non-Breeding Season in Sheep.

Nesrein M Hashem, Ahmed S El-Hawy, Moharram F El-Bassiony, Ibrahim S Abd El-Hamid, Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes, Paula Martinez-Ros

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Reproductive and immune-related consequences ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Application of Exogenous GnRH in Food Animal Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nesrein M HashemDepartment of Animal and Fish Production, Agriculture Faculty (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0058-9671
Ahmed S El-HawyAnimal and Poultry Physiology Department, Desert Research Center (DRC), Cairo 11753, Egypt.
Moharram F El-BassionyAnimal and Poultry Physiology Department, Desert Research Center (DRC), Cairo 11753, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6067-0503
Ibrahim S Abd El-HamidAnimal and Poultry Physiology Department, Desert Research Center (DRC), Cairo 11753, Egypt.
Antonio Gonzalez-BulnesDepartamento de Produccion y Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal, Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, C/Tirant lo Blanc, 7, Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-4475
Paula Martinez-RosDepartamento de Produccion y Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal, Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, C/Tirant lo Blanc, 7, Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.
Desert Research Center · EGUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESAlexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is aimed at determining the reproductive performance of anestrous ewes treated with nanoencapsulated GnRH after a progesterone-based protocol for estrus induction was proposed as a way of replacing eCG. A total of sixty anestrous, multiparous, non-lactating Barki ewes were randomly allocated into three homogenous groups and subjected to a CIDR-based estrus induction protocol. The first group (eCG) received an intramuscular (i.m.) injection of 350 IU of eCG at CIDR removal. The second (LNGnRH) and third (HLNGnR) groups received either 25 µg or 50 µg of encapsulated GnRH nanoparticles by the i.m. route in the form of spherical GnRH-encapsulated chitosan-TPP nanoparticles (which were 490.8 nm and had a 13.6 mV positive charge) 48 h after CIDR removal. Follicular dynamics, estrous behavior, luteal activity, and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Three days after CIDR removal, the number of large follicles increased by similar amounts in the LNGnRH and eCG groups and were significantly higher in both groups than in the HNGnRH group. However, no differences were observed in the numbers and diameters of CLs among the experimental groups and, on the other hand, treatment with HNGnRH significantly increased blood serum progesterone levels compared with eCG and LNGnRH. Treatment with HNGnRH increased conception, lambing, and fecundity rates (

Indexed as

gonadotrophinsnano delivery systemreproductionseasonal anestroussheep

Identifiers

PMID36979043
PMCPMC10045856
OpenAlexW4321598256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.