ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Symmetry-Based Superposition Method for Planning and Surgical Outcome Assessment.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computer-aided surgical planning has been widely used to increase the safety and predictability of surgery. The validation of the target of surgical planning to surgical outcomes on a patient-specific model is an important issue. The aim of this research was to develop a robust superposition method to assess the deviation of planning and outcome by using the symmetrical characteristic of the affected target. The optimal symmetry plane (OSP) of an object is usually used to evaluate the degree of symmetry of an object. We proposed a refined OSP-based contouring method to transfer a complex three-dimensional superposition operation into two dimensions. We compared the typical iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm with the refined OSP-based contouring method and examined the differences between them. The results using the OSP-based method were much better than the traditional method. As for processing time, the OSP-based contouring method was 11 times faster than the ICP method overall. The proposed method was not affected by the metallic artifacts from medical imaging or geometric changes due to surgical intervention. This technique can be applied for post-operative assessment, such as quantifying the differences between surgical targets and outcomes as well as performing long-term medical follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.