Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978725›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Cardiac MRI: A Review.

Julio A Oscanoa, Matthew J Middione, Cagan Alkan, Mahmut Yurt, Michael Loecher, Shreyas S Vasanawala, Daniel B Ennis

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal applications: a primer for radiologists.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The future of CMR: All-in-one vs. real-time CMR (Part 2).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julio A OscanoaDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2847-8896
Matthew J MiddioneDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-8131
Cagan AlkanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mahmut YurtDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3280-4217
Michael LoecherDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-1113
Shreyas S VasanawalaDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1999-6595
Daniel B EnnisDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7435-1311
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an essential clinical tool for the assessment of cardiovascular disease. Deep learning (DL) has recently revolutionized the field through image reconstruction techniques that allow unprecedented data undersampling rates. These fast acquisitions have the potential to considerably impact the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of DL-based reconstruction methods for CMR. We place special emphasis on state-of-the-art unrolled networks, which are heavily based on a conventional image reconstruction framework. We review the main DL-based methods and connect them to the relevant conventional reconstruction theory. Next, we review several methods developed to tackle specific challenges that arise from the characteristics of CMR data. Then, we focus on DL-based methods developed for specific CMR applications, including flow imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and quantitative tissue characterization. Finally, we discuss the pitfalls and future outlook of DL-based reconstructions in CMR, focusing on the robustness, interpretability, clinical deployment, and potential for new methods.

Indexed as

cardiac magnetic resonance imagingdeep learningimage reconstructionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36978725
PMCPMC10044915
OpenAlexW4323360847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read26
table measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.