Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978720›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Pelvic Floor Pressures Differ Based on Location in the Pelvis and Body Position: A Cadaver Mode.

Tova Ablove, Alexandra DeRosa, Steven Lewis, Katelyn Benson, Frank Mendel, Scott Doyle

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tova AbloveJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203-1121, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-1167
Alexandra DeRosaJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203-1121, USA.
Steven LewisJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203-1121, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-4203
Katelyn BensonJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203-1121, USA.
Frank MendelJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203-1121, USA.
Scott DoyleJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203-1121, USA.

Funding

Improving Virtual Gross Anatomy: Enhancing the Information Content of Cadaveric CT ScansF31EB030904 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LEWIS, STEVEN · 2021 to 2022
$62k
NIBIB NIH HHS 5 F31 EB030904NIBIB NIH HHS F31 EB030904University at Buffalo IMPACT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pelvic floor is a bowl-shaped complex of multiple muscles and fascia, which functions to support the pelvic organs, and it aids in controlling continence. In pelvic floor disease, this complex becomes weakened or damaged leading to urinary, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse. It is unclear whether the position of the body impacts the forces on the pelvic floor. PURPOSE: The primary objective of this work is to measure force applied to the pelvic floor of a cadaver in sitting, standing, supine, and control positions. The secondary objective is to map the forces across the pelvic floor.

methodsAn un-embalmed female cadaver without pelvic floor dysfunction was prepared for pelvic floor pressure measurement using a pressure sensory array placed on top of the pelvic floor, and urodynamic catheters were placed in the hollow of the sacrum, the retropubic space, and at the vaginal apex. Pressure measurements were recorded with the cadaver in the supine position, sitting cushioned without external pelvic floor support, and standing. Pressure array data were analyzed along with imaging of the cadaver. Together, these data were mapped into a three-dimensional reconstruction of the pressure points in pelvic floor and corresponding pelvic organs.

resultspressures were higher at the symphysis than in the hollow of the sacrum in the standing position. Pressure array measurements were lowest in the standing position and highest in the sitting position. Three-dimensional reconstruction confirmed the location and accuracy of our measurements.

conclusionsThe findings of increased pressures behind the symphysis are in line with the higher incidence of anterior compartment prolapse. Our findings support our hypothesis that the natural shape and orientation of the pelvis in the standing position shields the pelvic floor from downward forces of the viscera.

Indexed as

biomechanicspelvic floor modelingpelvic floor structurepelvic organ prolapsepressure analysis

Identifiers

PMID36978720
PMCPMC10045375
OpenAlexW4323317945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.