Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978607›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Uterine Tube Resection by Vaginotomy as an Alternative to Ovariectomy in Mature Cattle.

Peter C Irons, Bryce Mooring, Natalie Warburton, Emma Dunston-Clarke, Gavin Pensini, Shona Hay, Teresa Collins

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter C IronsSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7374-9720
Bryce MooringBroome Cattle Vets, Djugun 6725, Australia.
Natalie WarburtonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8498-3053
Emma Dunston-ClarkeSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-4808
Gavin PensiniWest Coast Veterinary Hospital, Forrestdale 6112, Australia.
Shona HayTableland Veterinary Service, Malanda 4885, Australia.
Teresa CollinsSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-0812
Murdoch University · AUEnvirons Kimberley · AUGold Coast Hospital · AU

Funding

Western Australian Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevention of pregnancy is desirable for female cattle destined for sale in the northern Australian rangelands for both economic and welfare reasons. Controlled access to bulls is often not feasible, nor are any non-surgical methods currently available. Many females are therefore surgically spayed. This study describes a technique for uterine tube resection (UTR), which leaves the ovaries intact and is performed using a vaginal approach, and compares the outcomes from 70 Brahman cows subjected to the procedure with 60 heifers spayed using the dropped ovary technique. The animals were monitored for 10 days following the surgery. There were no mortalities, and two animals were treated for illnesses after the UTRs and recovered. The animals subjected to both surgical procedures showed signs of pelvic discomfort and mild inflammation during recovery. The cows gained an average of 9.3 kg (SD 14.5 kg) of weight over the 10 days of the study compared to the spayed heifers, which lost 3.5 kg (SD 13.3 kg), with 19 and 63% of the animals in each of the groups losing weight, respectively. Uterine tube resection can be considered as a viable alternative to surgical spaying.

Indexed as

bovinegestationoviductreproductive anatomyreproductive controlsurgical spay

Identifiers

PMID36978607
PMCPMC10044419
OpenAlexW4327621025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.