Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978508›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Antimicrobial Resistance in Physiological and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria Isolated in Southern Italian Bats.

Maria Foti, Rosario Grasso, Vittorio Fisichella, Antonietta Mascetti, Marco Colnaghi, Maria Grasso, Maria Teresa Spena

Full text read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Phylogenetic analysisOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria FotiDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, Via Palatucci 13, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5591-8976
Rosario GrassoDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124 Catania, Italy.
Vittorio FisichellaDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, Via Palatucci 13, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Antonietta MascettiDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, Via Palatucci 13, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Marco ColnaghiDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria GrassoDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124 Catania, Italy.
Maria Teresa SpenaDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124 Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of antimicrobial resistance is one of the major health emergencies of recent decades. Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria threaten not only humans but also populations of domestic and wild animals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distribution of antibiotic resistance (AMR) and multidrug resistance (MDR) in bacterial strains isolated from six Southern-Italian bat populations. Using the disk diffusion method, we evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of 413 strains of Gram-negative bacteria and 183 strains of Gram-positive bacteria isolated from rectal (R), oral (O) and conjunctival (C) swabs of 189 bats belonging to 4 insectivorous species (

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancebatsdisk diffusion testGram-negative bacteriaGram-positive bacteria

Identifiers

PMID36978508
PMCPMC10044454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.