Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978439›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Disease-Specific Quality Indicators for Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Infections (ESAC Quality Indicators) Applied to Point Prevalence Audit Surveys in General Practices in 13 European Countries.

Akke Vellinga, Addiena Luke-Currier, Nathaly Garzón-Orjuela, Rune Aabenhus, Marilena Anastasaki, Anca Balan, Femke Böhmer, Valerija Bralić Lang, Slawomir Chlabicz, Samuel Coenen and 9 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 12 countries.

Akke VellingaSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6583-4300
Addiena Luke-CurrierSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Nathaly Garzón-OrjuelaSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6181-8154
Rune AabenhusResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marilena AnastasakiDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Anca BalanBalan Medfam Srl, 400064 Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Femke BöhmerInstitute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Valerija Bralić LangDepartment of Family Medicine, "Andrija Stampar" School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10020 Zagreb, Croatia.
Slawomir ChlabiczDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland.
Samuel CoenenDepartment of Family Medicine & Population Health, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-8052
Ana García-SangenísInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6689-6466
Anna KowalczykCentre for Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-2085
Lile MalaniaNational Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi and Arner Science Management LLC, 0190 Tbilisi, Georgia.
Angela TomacinschiiUniversity Clinic of Primary Medical Assistance, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Nicolae Testemițanu", MD-2004 Chişinǎu, Moldova.
Sanne R van der LindeJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emily BongardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK.
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-3453
Herman GoossensLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Alike W van der VeldenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University College Dublin · IEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Oxford · GBCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESMedical University of Białystok · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLNational Center for Disease Control and Public Health · GENicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy · MDUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Rostock · DEUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

The Innovative Medicine Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (VALUE-Dx) 820755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to 80% of antibiotics are prescribed in the community. An assessment of prescribing by indication will help to identify areas where improvement can be made. A point prevalence audit study (PPAS) of consecutive respiratory tract infection (RTI) consultations in general practices in 13 European countries was conducted in January-February 2020 (PPAS-1) and again in 2022 (PPAS-4). The European Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption quality indicators (ESAC-QI) were calculated to identify where improvements can be made. A total of 3618 consultations were recorded for PPAS-1 and 2655 in PPAS-4. Bacterial aetiology was suspected in 26% (PPAS-1) and 12% (PPAS-4), and an antibiotic was prescribed in 30% (PPAS-1) and 16% (PPAS-4) of consultations. The percentage of adult patients with bronchitis who receive an antibiotic should, according to the ESAC-QI, not exceed 30%, which was not met by participating practices in any country except Denmark and Spain. For patients (≥1) with acute upper RTI, less than 20% should be prescribed an antibiotic, which was achieved by general practices in most countries, except Ireland (both PPAS), Croatia (PPAS-1), and Greece (PPAS-4) where prescribing for acute or chronic sinusitis (0-20%) was also exceeded. For pneumonia in adults, prescribing is acceptable for 90-100%, and this is lower in most countries. Prescribing for tonsillitis (≥1) exceeded the ESAC-QI (0-20%) in all countries and was 69% (PPAS-1) and 75% (PPAS-4). In conclusion, ESAC-QI applied to PPAS outcomes allows us to evaluate appropriate antibiotic prescribing by indication and benchmark general practices and countries.

Indexed as

antibiotic prescribingauditprimary health carequality in healthcarerespiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID36978439
PMCPMC10044809
OpenAlexW4324140967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read61
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.