Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978328›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Drivers of Antibiotic Use in Semi-Intensive Poultry Farms: Evidence from a Survey in Senegal.

Eve Emes, Adiouma Faye, Nichola Naylor, Dagim Belay, Babacar Ngom, Awa Gueye Fall, Gwen Knight, Michel Dione

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unexplained High Prevalence of ESBL-Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eve EmesCentre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Adiouma FayeInternational Livestock Research Institute, Rue 18 Cité Mamelles, Dakar BP 24265, Senegal.
Nichola NaylorUK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Av., London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Dagim BelayDepartment of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Nørregade 10, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Babacar NgomVeterinary Services Directorate, Ministry of Livestock and Animal Products of the Republic of Senegal, 37 Avenue Pasteur, Dakar BP 67, Senegal.
Awa Gueye FallVeterinary Services Directorate, Ministry of Livestock and Animal Products of the Republic of Senegal, 37 Avenue Pasteur, Dakar BP 67, Senegal.
Gwen KnightDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Centre for Antibiotic Resistance, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Michel DioneInternational Livestock Research Institute, Rue 18 Cité Mamelles, Dakar BP 24265, Senegal.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUK Health Security AgencyUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W031310/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), the capacity of microbial pathogens to survive in the presence of antimicrobials, is considered one of the greatest threats to human health worldwide and is growing rapidly in importance. AMR is thought to be driven in part by the use of antimicrobials (AMU) in livestock production. AMU reduction in agriculture is therefore important, but doing so may endanger farmers' livelihoods and hamper broader food security. Understanding the drivers for farmers' antibiotics use is essential for designing interventions which avoid harming agricultural output and to safeguard farmers' economic security. In this study, we analyse AMUSE survey data from poultry farmers in Senegal to explore the effects of vaccination, attitudes towards AMR, and biosecurity practices on: AMU, animal mortality, and farm productivity. We found that farmers with more "AMR-aware" attitudes may be less likely to use antibiotics in healthy birds. Stronger on-farm biosecurity was associated with less use of antibiotics in healthy birds, and in some specifications was linked to higher broiler productivity. Vaccination and AMU were both higher in farms with a higher disease prevalence, and both factors appeared conducive to higher broiler productivity. Overall, there is evidence that awareness raising and biosecurity improvements could encourage prudent use of antibiotics, and that biosecurity and vaccination could to some extent replace antibiotic use as productivity-enhancing and disease management tools in broiler farms. Finally, issues of farm antimicrobial stewardship must be considered at the structural level, with farm behaviours contingent on interaction with state and private stakeholders.

Indexed as

agricultureantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipbiosecurityOne Health

Identifiers

PMID36978328
PMCPMC10044536
OpenAlexW4322500846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.